Forgot your password?

3D Film and Television, the Future or Just a Fad?

By Edited Jul 15, 2015 5 18

The concept of three dimensional (3D), or stereoscopic, films and television programs is not new, the first attempts at 3D films date back to the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth. The earliest methods were to project two different images side by side and use a pair of glasses to converge them into one, three dimensional image. This method was not suitable for theatrical release.

3D films themselves have gone in phases through the years, as new techniques have been discovered or applied, causing a spurt in popularity. Many methods rely on supplying different images to each eye, thus creating the impression of a three dimensional image to the viewer. Although there are a number of possible methods for producing a 3D image, such as interference, eclipse and Pulfrich, the two most commonly used in cinemas are the anaglyph method and the polarisation method.

Anaglyph Method

Anaglyph Glasses(89119)
This was the earliest method of practical 3D theatrical films, and was invented in 1915. This uses a pair of glasses, with one red and one cyan lens. Each lens cancels out the filter colour, creating the appearance of a three dimensional image.

These glasses were typically made from cardboard, and were worn like a normal pair of glasses. If the viewer wore glasses normally, wearing these glasses was, needless to say, very difficult.

The anaglyph method has been only rarely used since the early 1950s, when it was replaced with the polarisation method, with the exceptions being those films where only a part was shot in 3D, such as in the 3D segment of the "final" Nightmare on Elm Street film, Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare.

Polarisation Method

RealD Glasses(89120)
This method has been the standard theatrical method for 3D since the 1950s, although the actual technology has changed. This method is that used by RealD 3D glasses, which is the standard for new 3D films. RealD places a circularly polarizing liquid crystal filter in front of the projector lens, and the viewer wears a pair of glasses which contain a pair of polarising filters that are oriented differently to each other. Each filter passes only the image that is correctly polarised, so each eye sees a different image, causing the three dimensional effect.

These glasses are usually large enough to be worn over a normal pair of glasses.

Autostereoscopic Systems

Nintendo 3DS(89121)
These do not require the use of glasses at all, although there are a number of ways of achieving this. The Nintendo 3DS uses parallax barrier autostereoscopy in its display. The parallax barrier is something that is placed in front of the image display , in the 3DS for example, that has a row of slits in it, so that each eye views a different row of pixels, creating what appears to be a three dimensional image using the parallax[2860] effect. These methods are still in development, and have not been usable for theatrical viewing as yet. The parallax barrier method in particular would require the film to displayed on a  display for viewers, rather than being projected by a camera at the rear of the theatre, which would likely require an investment in technology that would not be compatible with any films displayed in the normal way.

"Fake" 3D

All the current methods of three dimensional films and televisions are basically "fake." They work by "conning" the eye that what they are seeing is 3D, when in fact it isn't. True 3D would be a projected holographic image - a staple of science fiction for many years, but still not developed - where the image itself occupies a three dimensional space, making the image actually 3D, not fake. Holographic technology, though, despite having been around for years, is still very much in its infancy; most images produced with it being static, like photographs, and usually not in true colours.

3D Technology Outside of Cinemas

Panasonic 3DTV
3D entertainment systems are becoming more commonplace. Televisions that provide a 3D image (3DTV) are getting cheaper, although they still require glasses. The previously mentioned Nintendo 3DS provides a 3D gaming experience. 3D television channels are available that provide 3D content. 3DVTVs also use a range of technologies to produce a three dimensional image. Development of 3D televisions has been slow due to customers being slow to purchase the technology. Currently, no standard exists for 3D entertainment technology. Until one is adopted, companies are going to be reluctant to commit themselves to produce systems using a technology that may fall by the wayside. Full autostereoscopic, glasses-free 3DTVs are not expected to be available commercially for some years.

Fad or the Future?

The current, glasses-driven technology is most likely a fad. Its use in films and television programmes frequently adds nothing to the experience, other than increasing the price and providing the chance of getting a nasty headache. Live action 3D, as opposed to computer generated imagery (CGI), especially if normal glasses are worn as well as the 3D glasses, frequently provides an image that is not as sharp as it could be, with slightly double images common, causing the viewer to squint and get a headache.

The quality of this imagery does increase substantially when the graphics are partially or wholly computer generated. The film Avatar, which included a lot of CGI, was noticeably more effective than, for example, Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance.

3D technology that requires glasses is likely to fall out of fashion pretty quickly. There are already less films being released in 3D than there were a year ago. If a viewer can't really tell that a film is in 3D, there's not going to be as much market for it.

3D itself is going to become more commonplace, whether it's by glasses free technology such as autostereoscopic, or the development of true holographic displays. If you're considering buying a 3DTV, wait a year or so and see how the technology advances first and whether the amount of content is increasing. At the very least, the price of the technology will decrease.

As mentioned, in a few more years commercially available glasses-free televisions will probably be available within the next few years. It probably isn't worth going to the expense of purchasing a 3DTV that requires the use of glasses until there is at the very least a common standard of 3D adopted, and if you do get headaches from watching this type of 3D image, not worth getting a television that requires glasses at all.

Nintendo 3DS XL - Red/Black
Amazon Price: $199.99 $155.49 Buy Now
(price as of Jul 15, 2015)


Apr 4, 2012 2:10am
I keep hoping it is just a fad, but its still hanging around longer than I expected. I hate wearing glasses for anything, and the glasses free versions are not much better. The 3DS makes me nauseous after about 20 seconds of use. Nice article.
Apr 4, 2012 4:10am
There does seem to be a slight decline in the number of films being produced in 3D, as the novelty wears off. I could certainly do without the headaches polarisation 3D gives me.
Apr 4, 2012 1:05pm
Yeah when home 3D first came out, waiting for the non-glasses version to come out seemed like the best option. I stand by the conspiracy that TV companies have that tech ready now and are just trying to cash in on the glasses! The glasses prices were obviously way to high. After I read about Gucci 3D glasses I knew it was going to far...
Apr 4, 2012 1:19pm
Gucci glasses? Now that is taking the mickey.

I'd still recommend waiting. Don't want to wind up purchasing either the Betamax or Video 2000 of 3DTVs.
Apr 6, 2012 11:07pm
Interesting feature. Even Apple is on the race for developing 3D for computers.
Apr 7, 2012 4:43am
The easiest way of doing 3D for computers would be to copy the way the Nintendo 3DS works on the computer's monitor I think.
Apr 7, 2012 11:33am
If it's already working on a smaller medium, I'm sure it can be applied to a bigger monitor as well.
May 30, 2012 4:48am
Very interesting article. I would like to add the so called "active shutter 3D" glasses. This is the so called "active 3D" system, rather than the passive 3D" of the polarizing glasses. Most TVs -along with some cinemas- use active shutter glasses, with Samsung and Sony leading the way. The only TV brand I know that uses Real-D like polarization glasses is LG. Here is a great article reviewing and comparing the two formats : http://bit.ly/KZag1R
So we are actually already there egdcltd : "Don't want to wind up purchasing either the Betamax or Video 2000 of 3DTVs"
May 30, 2012 6:26am
I would like them to produce a 3DTV as standard that doesn't need glasses to use. I find adding 3D glasses on top of normal glasses to be a literal pain.

Holographic displays are still not on the horizon though.
Jun 8, 2012 12:44pm
Cat Women on the Moon is my favorite 3D film. Check it out, it's something else!
Jun 8, 2012 12:57pm
Not one I've hear of, but it's quite old. Is it anaglyph?
Jun 8, 2012 1:54pm
Here's a couple of link for you to check out, yeah it's anaglyph I believe
Jun 8, 2012 1:59pm
Yeah I think it is. It's on youtube if you want to look. I tried to leave a link to it but it was flagged as spam . . .
Jun 9, 2012 1:57am
I don't actually have any anaglyph glasses - they are even harder to wear over normal glasses than RealD ones.
Jun 22, 2012 11:20pm
I have a 3Ds and it is pretty cool. I actually bought the 3D over the regular one because it was that cool. I don't play it though (kids) so I am sure if I stared at the screen long enough I might start to feel a little off lol meggiestardust
I would love to have a 3D tv but I was thinking the same thing...Is this just a fad? I wasn't sure if it was going to catch on. I see them all the time- Huge Mega Screen 3D capable TV's on a Home shopping Channel--but I never call up. It is always a thought in the back of my head that maybe something greater will come out soon or this fad will just fade...nice article, Thank You.
Jun 23, 2012 1:30am
I think we will see more 3D entertainment in the future; I'm just doubtful that the present trends are anything more than a fad.
Jan 10, 2015 4:48am
Quite interesting! For kids I believe the 3Ds will do fine:)
Jan 11, 2015 6:34am
It's an interesting device and it's been around for a while now.
Add a new comment - No HTML
You must be logged in and verified to post a comment. Please log in or sign up to comment.


  1. "Parallax." Wikipedia. 10/03/2012 <Web >

Explore InfoBarrel

Auto Business & Money Entertainment Environment Health History Home & Garden InfoBarrel University Lifestyle Sports Technology Travel & Places
© Copyright 2008 - 2016 by Hinzie Media Inc. Terms of Service Privacy Policy XML Sitemap

Follow IB Technology