Forgot your password?

Implications of Homosexual Marriage

By Edited Nov 28, 2015 0 3

Gay Pride 090
Homosexuality, or an “[e]xclusive and consistent attraction to same-sex partners”[1] has effected millions of people throughout the generations.  History shows that homosexual tendencies have been present in many different cultures and time periods, yet the term still consists of a strong taboo, especially in Western societies in which religion is a major underlying drive.  Despite the negative views of the subject, and despite the numerous ways homosexuals have been persecuted throughout history, many people still claim some degree of varying sexuality (homosexuality and bisexuality, for example).  This article will attempt to address the misconceptions and causes of this practice and will examine why regulations should not be imposed regarding homosexual behavior, namely in the case of allowing homosexuals to legally marry.

First it is important to note that homosexual behavior has been known to exist for hundreds of years and within many various species.  It wasn’t until the emergence of Christianity some 2000 years ago when sexual liberation was the norm that this changed.  Prior to Christianity, sexual activity was unregulated and allowed for both genders (though mostly men) to experiment with anyone or anything sexually (children, animals, inanimate objects, other people, groups of people, and so on).  Believing that this act would be detrimental to society, the writers of the Bible first aimed to “de-sexualize God and religion”.  "‘In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth’ by his will, not through any sexual behavior. This was an utterly radical break with all other religions, and it alone changed human history” [5].  With specific rules now regulating what is and isn’t considered appropriate (much of which surrounded the appropriate context of sexual relations as being between married heterosexual couples specifically for procreation) homosexuals became deviant outcasts.   

Though it is safe to say that homosexuals have suffered from discrimination in countless ways throughout history, the numbers of self-proclaimed homosexuals has not diminished.  The question thus becomes what the ultimate cause of homosexuality is.   Some who oppose homosexual unions stand on the belief that it is caused by environmental factors learned throughout an individual’s lifetime.  Others claim that same-sex attraction is embedded into a person’s genes and therefore should not be subject to discrimination. “At this point the typical argument of whether H[omosexuality] is genetic or environmental can be easily answered as probably either or both, depending on the case; furthermore, evidence for the ‘gay gene’ has never been clear”[2].  Because children learn much about their individual sexuality through interaction with family and peers and through images they absorb via media, excessive exposure to homosexuality might lead to increased homosexual tendencies among youth.  However, one must already possess an underlying urge to sway one direction or the other in order for exposure to homosexuality to have a significant impact on one’s sexual orientation.  With more and more people “coming out”, exposure is up and thus more people feel comfortable openly expressing their preferences. 

Unfortunately, fear of overexposure to homosexuality has many people concerned, so much that it has become a reason to deny marriage or parental rights to homosexuals.  Not only have 32 US states denied homosexuals the right to become legally wed (Neumeister, 2012), but many homosexual parents who have conceived the traditional way must face the fear of having their rights as parents stripped simply because of their sexual preferences.  Law in some states simply requires proof of a parent’s homosexuality in order to revoke custody.  This is termed the per se approach[3] and should be considered unconstitutional given the fact that “a child of gay parents is not more likely to be gay than with heterosexual parents” and other studies “have reported that these children do relatively well”[2].  Homosexuality alone should therefore have no effect in determining whether or not a parent is fit to raise is or her own child or children.

Just as one’s ability to parent should not be determined by such label, so too should it not be allowed to keep two consenting adults from being legally wed and gaining all of the benefits married couples get, including property rights and tax breaks.  This is not the world 2,000 years ago when sexuality was openly unrestrained.  Homosexuals do not choose their lifestyle based on perversion.  When homosexuals wish to get married, it is because of a strong desire to share their lives with one another exclusively.  Also, as studies have shown, allowing homosexuals to attain legal marriages will not increase the occurrences of homosexuality except by showing people that it is not something to be ashamed of.  Great strides have been made including one in which a federal appeals court recently deemed DOMA, or the Defense of Marriage Act (which defines marriage as a union specifically between a man and a woman), unconstitutional[4].  Hopefully, this is proof that old ideas about the danger and perversion surrounding homosexuality are diminishing.  There is no doubt a long road ahead, but equality for homosexuals is steadily on the rise.







Nov 3, 2012 7:45pm
Interesting article but whether you agree with me or not, homosexuality will always be wrong and immoral. You talk about the Bible but didn't God destroy a city for homosexuality? Sodom and Gomorrah? If God intended for human beings to be homosexuals, then the human race would become extinct because two women can't procreate and two men can't procreate. Just my humble opinion...Marriage is for man and woman. Anything else is sacrilege and blashemy.
Nov 3, 2012 8:06pm
I respect your opinion and have heard the argument before about marriage being a means to populate the planet, but I also know that societies need what is termed a "leveling mechanism" to keep the population at a stable number. Every species has a leveling mechanism of some sort (animals in the wild are a part of the food chain which keeps their numbers balanced), but because humans are at the top of the food chain, especially due to our many technological advancements which other species are incapable of, there is no such thing designed to keep our numbers in balance. This is why our global population has reached more than 7 billion, and we're depleting our resources faster than we can create new ones. I will not deny the concept of divine creation, but that, too, would entail the need for the same leveling mechanism that every other species on our planet has. Why can't homosexual relations be directly related to our planet's need for a human leveling mechanism? Without the need for plagues or other disasters, that is.
Nov 4, 2012 9:06am
Interesting response. I must compliment you on the fact that you were able to rationalise without taking my comments personally. That shows great character and your argument also shows you are very intelligent. I humbly respect that theory you gave but from a moral stance, I just believe that homosexuality is wrong in the eyes of God just like fornication is wrong, adultery is wrong, murdering is wrong or lying is wrong. In God's eyes, all of these actions are wrong. Therefore, the adulteror is no better than the homosexual; the thief is no better from the murderer. I don't even care personally what gays do in their own bedrooms or homes. It is their business- I cannot judge anyone cause I am a sinner myself...but...when gays demand the right to marry, when biblically speaking, I see marriage as happening between a man and woman, I just think it is taking things too far... But thank you for a stimulating article which allowed me to ponder a moment. Few articles stimulate me to actually feel motivated to write a comment so consider yourself an excellent, intellectually stimulating writer! :) Cheers and may you make loads of money here!
Add a new comment - No HTML
You must be logged in and verified to post a comment. Please log in or sign up to comment.


  1. Crooks, R., & Baur, K. Our Sexuality. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2011.
  2. Huges, J. R. "A general review of recent reports on homosexuality and lesbianism." Sexuality & Disability. 24 (2006): 195-205.
  3. Lehman, A. "Inappropriate injury: The case for barring consideration of parent." Family Law Quarterly. 13/03/2014 <Web >
  4. Neumeister, L "Doma ruled unconstitutional by federal appeals court in New York." The Huffington Post. 18/10/2012. 13/03/2014 <Web >
  5. Prager, Dennis "Judaism." Catholic Education. 13/03/2014 <Web >

Explore InfoBarrel

Auto Business & Money Entertainment Environment Health History Home & Garden InfoBarrel University Lifestyle Sports Technology Travel & Places
© Copyright 2008 - 2016 by Hinzie Media Inc. Terms of Service Privacy Policy XML Sitemap

Follow IB Lifestyle