Accusations of malpractice towards certain professionals, especially those geared towards accountancy, law, medicine, dentistry and insurance, have become a common event, especially in the line of an already long and seasoned career. Yet, despite it being common and frequent, it still doesn't change the fact that being accused of malpractice can be immensely distressing, emotionally exhausting and even, in extremes, traumatizing. Sometimes, professionals are accused unjustifiably by their clients when the complainant is not satisfied with the professional's work, even if the professional acted in good faith or if the results that happened to the client was different from what he/she expected like in malpractice. Hence, the case can only bring about anger, frustration and shock to the professional. Fortunately, a lawyer can provide for the best counsel to help counter these malpractice claims.

Malpractice defense lawyers serve as consultants and advisers in how to go about the allegations, like in plastic surgery malpractice cases. Since such allegations can cause a huge impact in a person's esteem, not to mention inferring implications that may occur to the professional's occupation, the defense lawyer should be able to counsel effectively and discuss with the client a systematic plan of action on how to go about the case because aside from financial implications that may be able to ruin a person's career or business, there is also the threat of the ruination of the professional's reputation which consequently can ruin the professional's livelihood and current and potential clientele.

In order to know if a malpractice defense lawyer is competent, one should be able to see the following from the aforementioned. One, a good attorney should have a systematic plan of action. Two, a good lawyer must be articulate enough and engage in clear communication with the client. Three, the client and the lawyer should have ongoing and constant communication. Four, a good lawyer must help the client in managing one's expectations so as to minimize disappointments and cushioning the blows. Lastly, a good lawyer must be able to discuss with the client a clear explanation of the billing procedures.

Lastly, one must be able to determine and hire a more effective lawyer to represent your case. In malpractice cases, there are 2 options as there are 2 kinds of attorneys involved in the issue of malpractice defense: one is the attorney from an insurance carrier who is usually appointed to represent the issue. This kind of attorney usually works directly with the insurance company and works primarily to meet the administrative requisites of the company. If the issue is not covered by the insurance company's policies, then the lawyer limits the defense for the client. The second kind of lawyer is the personal malpractice defense lawyer who is involved in the case because they were directly hired. This kind of attorney's interest, on the other hand, is to defend the accused, regardless of carriers and policies of insurance companies. Despite the limitations and differences of these two lawyers, both of their goals should be to effectively win the case and defend their clients but it is more advisable to be represented by a personal defense lawyer who specializes in legal malpractice issues.