Developing the skills of analysis
When I was at a teacher training college, we were
sort of envious at students of the engineering department who were so
adept at solving mathematical problems. Some thought that the
competence was acquired through the science of calculus; others were of
the opinion that the skills were inborn. Be that as they may be, I was
intrigued at the idea of having or rather developing an analytical
mind.
Then came the Spassky-Fischer chess championship tiff. Again it
was sort of a mystery to me how these grandmasters view the board,
think of the myriad possibilities and effects of such and such moves.
Later, much, much later I came across an article that may have a role
in introducing me to the skill of analysis. The article featured four
geometrical shapes: a rectangle, a circle, a triangle, and a heart. It
asked the identities of the shapes, which shape belong to each other
and what was the basis for classifying them into categories.
After some
time I was able to get identify them and classified them into proper
categories. Reflecting on my success, I reviewed my step and it dawned
on me that the procedure I followed is just one approach in analysis.
Analysis starts first with identifying the element or geometrical shape
I was presented. That was the easy part: the first was a rectangle,
next was a circle, third was a triangle, and the last was a heart.
The
next step was a bit advanced for me: I must find the common features
and differences among the figures I was confronted with. Well the
rectangle and triangle go together and the circle and heart go
together. Then came the whammy question: What is the basis of your
classification? This was most difficult for me as I barely passed
mathematics in high school! Of course it was a no-brainer to most but
certainly formidable for me. Thunder and lightning! It dawned on me
that figures bound by straight lines are squares and triangles while
figures bound by curved lines can be circles, ellipses, and even
hearts!
A teaching stint in graduate school refined the procedure.
During one session on problem identification, I was able to put across
the procedure in a not-so-pedantic a tone: First identify elements in a
milieu, break them down, look for patterns, similarities and
differences. Find a way to organize them so that they assume
significance and state the rule for organizing them in the chosen
manner.



Yes
No
Flag



Comments
Add a new comment - No HTMLYou must be logged in and verified to post a comment. Please log in or sign up to comment.