Although scientific psychologists act apart of each other and hold differing opinions with themselves on multifold crucial points, but their procedure and prevalent line of research are rather pretty near identical. They all attend to clinical cases for longer than a short time, careful research laboratory experiments are the contemporary fad of the Hypnotist and their vital achievement lays inside the terrain of the conscious. The objective psychologists look to be on the trackway of a rich gold vein. Without mindfully formulating their tactics, they have all, as if by a common tacit accord, selected the right approach that leads to a higher quality and extended vision into the heart of hypnosis. For the method of consciousness is abstruse deep below in the core of the subliminal self, and it is there we must descend in order to achieve a clear comprehension of the consciousness.

The German hypnosis school, with Wundt at its captain, primarily started out on much the same lines, for all that they might not arrive at any use of the subconscious, and their speculations ran wild in the fancies of Hartmann. The excuse of this nonsuccess is due to the certitude that the abstraction of the sub-conscious as conceived by the German school was overly vague, and had kind of the attribute of a machinelike than that of a psychical process. An inattentive mind that was their notion of the subliminal self. In such an arrangement as this the subliminal was absolutely unimportant, mere balderdash, and had to be dumped. The German psychical investigations are at this moment confined to the content of consciousness in so far as the individual is at once conscious of it. For all that as this form of consciousness is remarkably narrow and circumscribed, the advantage arrived at, although remarkable for their attention to detail, are after all of a noticeably piddling nature. It is what Dr.. James appropriately characterizes "the elaboration of the evident." We may and so, with full advantage, attest that it was the French psychologists who produced proper use of the mind and arrived at data that are of the greatest interest to hypnosis, even though it was well if the French were to conduct their investigations with German adeptness.

The interpretation of personality, with its environs and its laws, forms a problem which until rather recently had to be referred to almost exclusively by analytic and meta-physical methods. Within the past twelve years; though, an endless amount of fresh empirical data had been injected into the discussion by the observations which the "recognition" by science of the hypnotic state set in motion. Many of these observations are pathological : fixed ideas, hysteric attacks, insane delusions, mediumistic phenomena, etc. And altogether, though they are far-removed from having laid bare the query of hypnosis, they should be acknowledged to have corrected its evident shape. What are the limits of the mind of a member of human species? Is " ego" consciousness exclusively a part of the complete consciousness? Are there multifold "selves" seperated from each other? What is the instrument of welding in a group of analogous ideas? How could specific systems of ideas be cut off and lost? Is personality a product, and not a principle ? Such are the research now being pushed to the lead, questions presently asked for the first time with some sense of their immaterial importance, and questions that it will call for a considerable quantity of added labor, both of research and of reasoning, to answer sufficiently.