Login
Password

Forgot your password?

Marx's And Weber's Views On The Origins Of Capitalism-And Who I Agree With

By Edited May 30, 2016 0 0

Overview Of The Origins Of Capitalism

Capitalism is a mode of production in which we live in today; it is an economic and profitable system which is concerned with producing and accumulating wealth.  Karl Marx and Max Weber both discuss their theory of the origin of capitalism which is different from each other.  Marx discusses capitalism through primitive accumulation; his main focus is on working hard, saving money, and investing to gain capital and become wealthy.  Alternately, Weber examines capital with a strong religious view and shows this through his work, The Protestant Ethic and Spirit of Capitalism.  His focal point is that labourers should work and save money for the glory of God, with emphasis on hard work, thrift and moral righteousness.  Weber’s notion which includes profiting not for yourself, but for God and how individuals should follow certain virtues to be good people is a theory which is not as significant as it use to be.  Today, people are more focused on becoming wealthy by working and investing that money they gained for much more profit which follows Marx’s notion.

 Karl Marx’s Views On The Origins Of Capitalism

Karl Marx emphasizes capital through his theory of primitive accumulation.  Primitive accumulation is referred to the starting point of capitalism and the most significant part in the development of it.  Primitive accumulation includes a cycle in which surplus-value is made through capital, and capital produces more surplus-value.  In capitalism, the people who saved and invested lived in luxury, while the people who were lazy and did not work lived in poverty; therefore, the rich became richer and the poor became poorer.  Moreover, there were two types of people categorized, the intelligent people and the lazy people.  The intelligent people accumulated their capital, they were owners of money and means of production, and they were eager to increase their values.  The lazy people did not work hard and did not invest; they were sellers of their own labour-power and spent their substance.  Those who labour live in poverty while those who don’t live in prosper.  Labour has nothing to sell but itself; the most significant condition of capitalism is to dispose the worker.  Marx states that the starting point of the development that gave rise to the wage-labourer as well as to the capitalist, was the servitude of the labourer.  This expresses that the labourer was subjective to their master; they did not take pleasure in freedom. 

Nevertheless, for capitalism to occur there has to be an initial capital, the initial investment for capital to accumulate.  This is a process that transforms the social means of substance and production into capital and at the same time transforms producers into wage-labourers.  Primitive accumulation is the process of divorcing the producer from the means of production; it forms the pre-historic stages of capital and corresponding mode of production.  Capitalism is interested in private property; the relationship between the people who own private property and the people who don’t, with those who control the means of production and the labourers.  One key theme in accumulating capital would be producing more than needed; therefore, accumulation occurs using the surplus goods.  Primitive accumulation is an action which reflected in the prosper of capitalism; it was the most prominent motive that used force to exert wealth and power and lead to further exploitation of the labourers.    

The Views On The Origins Of Capitalism Of Max Weber

Weber wrote The Protestant Ethic which is one of the most influential sociology books ever written.  Weber states that capitalism is motivated by the pursuit of profit; profit that will be renewed forever by the means of continuous enterprise.  This influence of gaining capital through the pursuit of profit encourages people to participate in work and accumulate wealth for investments.  The impulse to pursuit the gain of money, the greatest amount as possible has been common to all sorts and conditions of men at all times and in all countries of the earth.  This approach is focused on the influence of certain religious ideas on the development of an economic spirit of an economic system; connecting the modern economic life with the rational ethics of ascetic Protestantism.  In addition, Weber maintained that the orderly attitude of asceticism was essential to the rise and eventual dominance of Western capitalism.  The spirit of capitalism refers to labourers being dedicated to their work; working more to make more money and also workers being punctual, honest, and frugal people.  Benjamin Franklin advocates these themes in explaining the work ethic.  It is believed by Franklin that these virtues, being honesty, punctuality and frugality are useful to the individual and is inevitable for strict utilitarianism. 

Therefore, if the worker proceeds with these virtues, the outcome will be very sufficient and rewarding and on the other hand, he who does not follow these norms will be eliminated from the economic scene as he who cannot or will not adapt will be without a job on the streets.  The spirit of capitalism indicates that money should not be spent on luxuries but rather saved and accumulated; increasing capital is the ultimate objective.  Moreover, Weber discuses the importance of calling in motivating individuals to pursue success; the individual’s salvation depended on the fulfilment of moral obligation to perform duties of his labour to the best of his abilities.  The calling serves as the basis in which individuals understand their life situations and determine their fate.  Individual’s actions are inspired by the desire to please God and ensure his grace, not to accumulate wealth as a means of purchasing goods.  Weber believes the calling had a major impact on the drastic growth of capitalism in the West.         

 My Thoughts On The Views Of Marx And Weber

I agree more with Karl Marx than Max Weber.  I believe Marx’s theory is more modern and accurate in today’s society, where as Weber’s theory was more prominent with previous generations.  The older generations were more religious and focused on working and accumulation capital for the glory of God as well as not spending their money on luxuries.  On the other hand, people in today’s society are more greedy and selfish; they want to gain capital for personal glory and purchase unnecessary commodities for themselves.  Marx and Weber thoroughly display their views which are similar in the sense of people craving the gain and accumulating of wealth and how to pursue it.  Although, on the contrary, their theories differ because Marx is encouraged by accumulating wealth by investing for one’s personal prosperity, while Weber believes in gaining wealth and capital for the glory of God .  Capitalism is society’s current mode of production that consists of the enhancement of capital and wealth through efficiency and surplus value.            

Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Add a new comment - No HTML
You must be logged in and verified to post a comment. Please log in or sign up to comment.

Explore InfoBarrel

Auto Business & Money Entertainment Environment Health History Home & Garden InfoBarrel University Lifestyle Sports Technology Travel & Places
© Copyright 2008 - 2016 by Hinzie Media Inc. Terms of Service Privacy Policy XML Sitemap

Follow IB Lifestyle