Login
Password

Forgot your password?

Why is Fracking is So Controversial?

By Edited Jul 27, 2016 4 13

Hydraulic Fracturing is a Divisive Issue

Hydraulic fracturing, perhaps better known as "fracking", is a method of extracting energy sources, most specifically oil and gas, from beneath the ground. The practice entails injecting high-pressurized water, sand and chemicals, to aid in breaking through rock to release the oil and gas trapped inside, creating a fracture in the shale.

This procedure allows the oil or gas to be released, which many industry experts say these energy sources would be too difficult to mine otherwise. However, in recent years the practice has become very controversial in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom and other countries.

Perceived Benefits of Fracking

Advocates of hydraulic fracturing note the accessing of otherwise unattainable oil and gas will allow a higher degree of energy independence. By engaging in fracking, a large amount of oil and gas can be attained, which some estimates say will help the United States be energy independent for approximately 100 to 110 years. In Canada, the estimates are similar. According to the the New Brunswick government, the gas reservoirs currently trapped in rock in the province could provide electricity for residential, industry and commercial use for over 100 years.

Additionally, by investing energies in fracking, proponents of this method of extraction of natural resources note the ability to increase jobs, benefiting both local economies and the overall job market. There are those in recent years who have said they believe the dangers of fracking are overstated. [1]

Hydraulic Fracturing-Related Activities
Credit: US Environmental Protection Agency/Public Domain

Illustration of hydraulic fracturing and related activities

Why Some People are Protesting Fracking

Many people believe fracking is dangerous to both the environment and health. The chemicals are said to be full of carcinogens and toxins such as lead, uranium, mercury, ethylene glycol, radium, hydrochloric acid, methanol and formaldehyde. [2]

Opponents to this practice point out the potential dangers to the environment which include wasteful and contaminated water. Allegedly, 1-8 million gallons of water and 40,000 gallons of chemicals are needed to run each fracturing job.

To add to the controversy, in 2012 it was reported a U.S. professor with financial ties to the gas industry had written in a study that fracking for gas deep beneath Earth's surface was not contributing to water contamination. [3]

The increased level of seismic activity is another concern and many feel not enough is known about the relationship between hydraulic fracturing and earthquakes that have occurred in both the United States and United Kingdom. A study funded by the National Science Foundation and U.S. Geological Survey in 2013 suggested at least three earthquakes were linked to fracking activities. There have been other studies on the issue that also suggest a correlation between earthquakes and fracking.

In late July 2012 , an estimated 5,000 activists arrived from several different states to Washington D.C. and marched up Capitol Hill to protest fracking. I was downtown that day and saw the groups collectively gathering in front of the Capitol building.

Activists arrive on Capitol Hill in 2012 to protest fracking

"No Fracking Way!"

The  2 p.m. (eastern time) rally, called "Stop the Frack Attack", began on the lawn of the U.S. Capitol Building and concluded with a rally march to the headquarters of America's Natural Gas Alliance and the American Petroleum Institute. Thousands of people raised their signs, chanted and donned anti-fracking t-shirts to make clear their opinions on this highly divisive issue.

Fracking protest on Capitol Hill (2012)
Credit: Leigh Goessl/All rights reserved

Fracking protest on Capitol Hill (2012)

Where Things Stand Now

Fast forward to 2016 and the debate continues in many countries, although the practice of hydraulic fracturing continues. A 2014 study suggested Ohio experienced hundreds of small earthquakes the prior year due to fracking. Even a city in oil and gas industry-friendly Texas is shaking things up trying to put a ban on this practice.

This issue has also become a hot one in Oklahoma where statistics are showing the "rate and severity of quakes soared as the amount of water injected increased", reported the LA Times on March 2, 2016. [11] Jump across the pond to Britain where fracking opponents are also highly worried about increased seismic activity. In March 2016 it was reported the British Geological Survey is looking at high-resolution imaging to be used as a standard surveying technique prior to any fracking. [12] A fracking operation in Fox Creek, located in Alberta, Canada, was shut down by government officials in January 2016 after a 4.8 quake occurred as per rules in that region. That facility is currently closed indefinitely. [14]

In the United States, dozens of states already engage in fracking, with several other states examining the issue. Gas-rich New York has debated this issue for years, however, in summer 2014 the state's highest court ruled each town can make its own decisions of whether or not to frack by using zoning ordinances as a guideline. [5]   This was a perceived win by the opponents of hydraulic fracking.

Photos at the 2015 Stop the Frack Attack National Summit in Denver, Holiday Inn - Stapleton
Credit: Image credit:Roger Smith posted on EARTHWORKS Flickr page/CC by 2.0 https://www.flickr.com/photos/earthworks/21733133549

In late 2014 Governor Andrew Cuomo, after years of delays to make a decision, banned the practice of hydraulic fracking altogether.  Several months later the "finishing touches" were put on the ban.

“After years of exhaustive research and examination of the science and facts, prohibiting high-volume hydraulic fracturing is the only reasonable alternative,” Joe Martens, head of the Department of Environmental Conservation, said in a June 2015 statement. “High-volume hydraulic fracturing poses significant adverse impacts to land, air, water, natural resources and potential significant public health impacts that cannot be adequately mitigated.” [13]

While now banned, the issue is still divisive with proponents of fracking believe it will have a huge negative economic effect on New York.

Jump to March 2016 and the Florida senate have dropped a fracking bill in the Sunshine State, but some lawmakers say the fight isn't over yet and the issue will resurface. [10] The fracking debate is also very active in Canada as well in various regions across the United States.

On the industry side, drilling services company Baker Hughes announced in October 2014 it will disclose its "cocktail" to increase transparency. Rules for companies sharing their chemical combinations vary from country to country and from state to state. For instance, in the United States, except California, for the most part, states did not require companies to disclose. This issue is still being hotly debated in many states.

What do you think? Is fracking a good or bad idea?

Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Oct 25, 2014 12:30pm
LittleTwoTwo
We really don't know what the side effects are and whether or not it is a good idea. I'm still on the fence myself, but the side for no fracking is some what 'winning' in my head - due to a lack of information about the consequences (or benefits) of fracking from reliable non biased sources. More research is needed for sure. thumbs up.
Oct 26, 2014 3:29am
LeighGoessl
Thanks LittleTwoTwo for reading and sharing your thoughts. Also for the thumbs up. At this time I am feeling no at this time, at least until experts -- as you point out, nonbiased ones -- can prove it is safe. I find it frustrating lawmakers often just rapidly push things through (fracking, GMOs, vaccinations, etc.) without getting the full picture.
Oct 29, 2014 6:28pm
Kai_Marley
Very well-written article! To answer your question, one thing that drives me bonkers is the boast by the oil and gas companies that it will provide "100 years of energy". It's in many campaigns and commercials as well. It's incredibly short-sighted to claim that 100 years is worth the potential hazard to our environment.
Oct 30, 2014 2:30am
LeighGoessl
Great point Kai Marley, thanks for reading and commenting. Too many decision makers in industry do seem to only look at the smaller picture -- or simply perhaps the bottom line.

(Welcome to InfoBarrel btw! It's a great site :)
Nov 26, 2014 7:34pm
Nineteenth
Great article. If only governments of the developed world would rather focus on enhancing the potential outcomes of investing in the field of renewable energy. No moral controversy would ever arise in that case and both parties would be satisfied.
Nov 28, 2014 3:33am
LeighGoessl
Thanks for reading and for your kind comment Nineteenth. I agree, there has to be a better solution where safety factors are fully known (but are any political parties truly able to work together?)
Nov 27, 2014 8:21am
Moina-Arcee
This is an informative and balanced article. Thanks for the information.
Nov 28, 2014 3:33am
LeighGoessl
Thank you kindly Moina-Arcee :)
Jan 28, 2015 12:56pm
AngelaParkerFables
I loved your article. It was very informative yet unbiased. Down in South Texas where I live fracking happens every day. We are definitely in the thick of it here. I personally don't have a problem with it, but I do agree that companies should disclose what they are pumping into the Earth. The creation of jobs and stimulation to the economy that it provides I believe has a lot of value. The fact remains though that oil and gas will run out, and this could happen in the lifetimes of our children or grandchildren. The sun will run out someday as well, but humans should be able to travel to an alternate universe by the time that happens. I am definitely excited about the advances being made in green living and look forward to what the future holds.
Jan 29, 2015 2:10am
LeighGoessl
Thanks so much Angela for reading and sharing your thoughts. I did try to present both sides of it, but in all honestly, I'm leaning against it at this point. I don't like the idea of those chemicals (especially that lack of disclosure you mention) being pumped into the ground. Yet, that economic factor you mention can't be ignored either.
Hopefully, the investments in green will continue and eventually become more feasible.
Jan 29, 2015 2:11am
LeighGoessl
BTW, welcome to InfoBarrel!
Apr 9, 2015 8:49pm
Shaddymak
quite informative. Personally I think its cool. Just like drilling
Apr 10, 2015 3:07am
LeighGoessl
Thanks for commenting Shaddymak. I would like to have more information before this continues. While there are benefits, I wonder if the costs are worth it?
Add a new comment - No HTML
You must be logged in and verified to post a comment. Please log in or sign up to comment.

Bibliography

  1. Julia Kollewe "Shale gas fracking risks exaggerated, insurance broker claims." The Guardian. 17/04/2012. 19/10/2014 <Web >
  2. "Dangers of Fracking." Dangers of Fracking. 19/10/2014 <Web >
  3. "Author of US fracking study had gas industry ties: watchdog." Phys.org. 27/07/2012. 19/10/2014 <Web >
  4. Associated Press "Fracking triggered hundreds of tiny earthquakes in eastern Ohio last fall, study suggests." Cleveland.com. 14/10/2014. 19/10/2014 <Web >
  5. "In Texas, a Fight Over Fracking." New York Times. 08/10/2014. 19/10/2014 <Web >
  6. "Is Fracking a Good Idea?." U.S. News. 19/10/2014 <Web >
  7. "New York Towns Can Prohibit Fracking, State’s Top Court Rules." New York Times. 30/06/2014. 19/10/2014 <Web >
  8. Media Release "GLOBAL FRACKDOWN STARTS: Majority of Canadians want fracking moratorium, says EKOS poll." The Council of Canadians. 08/10/2014. 19/10/2014 <Web >
  9. "What is fracking and why is it so controversial?." CTV News. 20/10/2013. 19/10/2014 <Web >
  10. "Senator withdraws bill to permit, regulate fracking in Florida." Palm Beach Post. 1/03/2016. 2/03/2016 <Web >
  11. "Oklahoma takes action on fracking-related earthquakes — but too late, critics say." LA Times. 02/03/2016. 2/03/2016 <Web >
  12. "British fracking surveys may address tremors." UPI. 1/03/2016. 2/03/2016 <Web >
  13. "New York makes fracking ban official." The Hill. 29/06/2015. 2/03/2016 <Web >
  14. "Fox Creek fracking operation closed indefinitely after earthquake." CBC News. 12/01/2016. 2/03/2016 <Web >

Explore InfoBarrel

Auto Business & Money Entertainment Environment Health History Home & Garden InfoBarrel University Lifestyle Sports Technology Travel & Places
© Copyright 2008 - 2016 by Hinzie Media Inc. Terms of Service Privacy Policy XML Sitemap

Follow IB Environment