Plastic Pandering

You wear black clothes, say you’re poetic
The sad truth is you’re just pathetic
 -“Instant Club Hit”, Dead Milkmen, ©1987


Something as innocently conceived as a children’s toy can be subverted and twisted into a subculture phenomenon, and not necessarily a psychically healthy one, either. 

One current “cosplay” (“costume play”) trend revolving around modern Asian ball-joint dolls (high-end collectibles not meant for children) has spawned many sexually mature young women and Doll Head: GeishaCredit: Vic Dillingerâ„¢, © 2012adolescent girls bent on looking, dressing, and acting like prepubescent, living versions of the archetypical “baby doll”.

That’s Not a Toy!
Historically, dolls figured heavily in religious iconography and rituals.  Very common are the pre-historic “Venus” figures (small, clay or carved-bone effigies of pregnant women with outsized hips and buttocks, and enormously swollen breasts).  The so-called “Venus of Willendorf”, a terra-cotta figure with outsized hips and breasts, is probably the best known of these; she would have been made as a totemic fetish for insuring good crop yields or in successful procreation. 
Roughly 3,000 years ago, the Egyptians made the first representational dolls, flattened clay figures of friends and servants to go with the dead into the Netherworld.  Later, religious figurines, after serving their sacred purposes, were given to children as playthings

The Greeks created the first known articulated dolls, with moveable limbs at the joints.  These were normally constructed of fired clay and assembled with leather thongs or rough-spun thread.  Dolls became more sophisticated as the centuries progressed.  They mirrored the societies in which they were crafted: they wore the fashions of the day, the hairstyles, and the popular facial colorings.

Ars Gratia Artis
The word “doll”, however, did not come into vogue until fairly recently – its earliest known usage dates to the year 1700.  The modern doll as a toy achieved its mass appeal once manufacturing allowed them to be made inexpensively and in quantities.  Before then, dolls were made by hand, and the craftsmanship, especially for the finer porcelain dolls was exquisite.  These were miniature works of statuary, not merely playthings, but of museum quality.

The split into two tiers of doll-making, finely hand-crafted figures and mass-produced toys, also created a schismatic collectors’ market.  Rare dolls are some of the highest valued items at any antiques’ auction and can routinely fetch price tags near the $10,000 and higher range.

In the 20th century, many dolls were the typical “baby doll”, grooming little mothers-to-be in the finer arts of child care: tending, feeding, and diapering their “baby”.  Barbie changed all that in the 1950s.  Although many celebrities had dolls made in their likenesses (for cross-promotional purposes) Barbie became an icon of a whole different type. She was not a “baby doll”.  Barbie was a “fashion” doll, and this changed the industry. 

Historic dollsCredit: American People's Encyclopedia, 1963

Today, there are innumerable dolls of varying body types and targeted demographics.  One of the most disturbing trends, though, is a fairly recent one from about 1999 or so in which dolls of exquisite tooling, proportion, and artistry were created not for a children’s market for play but for adult collectors.  And the dolls, known generically as “ball-joint dolls”, are the center of a disquieting sub-culture that apparently glories in the idea of the  pre-pubescent, but sexualized, young girl.

Young Stuff
Forbidden attractions for young, tender females have been one of Hollywood’s mainstays almost from the start.  Classic films explore the theme of the nymphet either innocently or wantonly drawing a weaker male toward a path of destruction.
 Carroll Baker (Elia Kazan's "Baby Doll", 1956)Credit: Warner Bros, 1956-1957

Two standout films probably best captured the titillating older man-teen girl romantic dilemma better than any other before or since.  The first is Elia Kazan’s brilliant dark drama, Baby Doll, from 1956.  In this film, a very mature man played by Karl Malden marries a teen girl, 17-year-old “Baby Doll”.  As part of an agreement with her dying father, Malden must wait until she is 20 years old before consummating their marriage.

When the movie picks up, Baby Doll is 19, close to her 20th birthday.  During the two years she has lived with Malden, she sleeps in an undersized child’s daybed, wears short little-girl dresses, and behaves very child-like.  Malden can barely contain himself, and Baby Doll, innocently or otherwise, torments him.

The 19-year-old nymph of this movie is played by a very curvaceous 25-year-old blond named Carroll Baker.  Her woman’s curves are clearly visible beneath the flimsy, ill-fitting dresses she wears, she is normally shoeless and barelegged, and has a wide-eyed sensuality.  It’s a very mixed message – this girl, neither victim nor vamp, isn’t bright enough to understand her power over this man, but she does somehow seem aware she has it.

The true pinnacle in both literature, and on-screen, of the May-December relationship is Lolita.  Nabokov wrote the book about a 12-year-old girl who is pursued and sexually conquered by a man old enough to be her father.  In the book, the narrator (written before the word “pedophile” came into common use) calls himself by the pseudonym “Humbert Humbert”.  Humbert, through a series of carefully contrived moves, marries Lolita’s mother just to get close to the girl.  After the mother dies in a hit-and-run accident, Humbert lies to Lolita and takes her off cross-country on a seemingly never-ending road trip to ruin.


Sue Lyon (as "Lolita", 1962)

After he first has sex with Lolita (whose given name is Dolores), she complains the next day of being in pain “down there”.  When Humbert presses her on the issue, Lolita tells him straightaway the truth: she is sore “from when you raped me”.

The movie, of course, is not so blunt, having been mainstreamed in 1962.  Also, to soothe other censorship concerns, Lolita’s age in the film was raised to 14 (still uncomfortable for America, but not nearly as uncomfortable as statutorily raping a 12-year-old as in Nabokov’s book).  She was played by an age-appropriate 14-year-old Sue Lyon whose iconic look has gone down in cinematic history.  

The Lolita movie image combined with school-girl gear helped make up much of the 1960’s mod look for teens and young women.  These fashion moves made the women look young, but they did not make them look like children.  They were still sexually mature women beneath their mini-dresses, their barrettes, hair parted on the side, and their bright red lipsticked mouths.


France Gall (French pop singer 1960s)

Both Baby Doll and Lolita spawned many imitators.  The theme was explored in I Walk the Line, starring Gregory Peck and Tuesday Weld in 1970.  It was later revisited by Drew Barrymore in the title role of 1992’s Poison Ivy, and by a 17-year-old Alicia Silverstone as the 14-year-old nymphet in the suspense film, The Crush (1993).

Danger in a Doll
The Germans and French produced the first modern ball-joint dolls in the late 19th Century.  Some of these were playthings; others were so finely crafted and expensive their intent was to go straight Typical ball-joint dollCredit: bjdcollectasy.cominto a viewing case without ever being touched by a child.

It was the higher aesthetic of the collector that spawned the modern Asian ball-joint doll.  Animé, the stylized Japanese cartoon art that specifically “Westernizes” its characters while retaining some Oriental flavor, was the inspiration for their “look”. 

Like animé drawings these dolls almost universally have slightly disproportionately larger heads than life would dictate. BJD anatomyCredit: CP/Lutz stock photo Similarly, their eyes are much wider, and expose more iris than would be found in a human female.  The mouths are usually small, angling toward bee-stung, they are anatomically correct (with breast buds molded into the skin, and in at least one known instance, a small indication of a vaginal slit). 

The doll’s internal structure sometimes carries a plastic skeletal frame over which polyurethane synthetic resins are cast.  The elements are banded together with thick elastic straps allowing for free movement of the joints while keeping them naturally tight.  These dolls are built for customization by painting or for changing the eyes and hair.  In fact many of them are sold Heath (a Dollfie doll, about 24" tall)Credit: wiki commons“naked” (without base face paint or permanent make-up) for the new owner to embellish the face as he or she sees fit.  This putting on of the face in the parlance of the trade is called a “face-up”. 

These dolls were first made under the brand name “Dollfie” (“doll figure”) in 1999 by a Japanese company, Volks.  The original line of animé- and manga-inspired dolls was expanded to include a larger model, the Super Dollfie.  Many times, all ball-joint dolls are generically (and erroneously) called “Dollfies” or “Super Dollfies” – these specific terms are trademarked model names.

In size these dolls range from the smallest (about 4” tall), up to the more common 16” and 24” dolls.  Many specialty types in the Super Dollfie line can be 36” tall or more.  Some have been made “life-sized” for the age-appropriate life stage of the doll (up to 4’ tall or more). All of the dolls have larger feet proportionately than Barbie; thus, they can stand upright without support.

The lack of true ethnic diversity in these collectibles is disconcerting and inexplicable.  Despite most of these dolls’ manufacture in Japan, South Korea, and China, almost none have classically Asian features.  They display variants of Blond BJDCredit: koreatlcthai.comWesternized eye shapes and longer, narrower noses.  Hair colors are mostly blond to honey blond (as preferred), and the skin is pale or pinkish.  Even the few “Oriental” dolls carry paler, less olive-toned skin with widened eyes. 

A search of images failed to produce any of these dolls with clearly Africanized features, hairstyles, or any skin tones that could be considered African.  The Westernized BJDs (“ball-joint dolls”) are clearly geared to the Caucasian market, preferred even among the Japanese who collect them.

Danger in Décolletage
These dolls are expensive, starting at several hundred dollars and easily exceeding $1000 in price often.  Limited editions can run as much as $5000. 

They are also almost all built along more womanly lines than an average child’s doll, with clearly defined hips, waists, and chests.  [Barbie, for instance is absurdly and grotesquely Ball-joint doll (mild bondage gear)Credit: proportioned Ball-joint doll ($650 price tag)compared to these dolls.]

Within the general category of BJDs there are sub-genres as well: Goth, vampire, elvish, fairy, and others.  The aficionados of these dolls are global, and there is a huge international community, both on-line and in person.

The sub-culture can be fairly creepy – many people take pictures of these dolls as if they are living beings, they talk of them in similar tones, the owners hold “fashion” photo shoots, and upload videos of their doll collections.  Worse, there is a fashion cult that has sprung up around them.

Certainly, not everyone who collects these dolls is perverse.  But, impressionable children are vulnerable to marketing and fads more than any other demographic, and the fashion cult that Woman in "Lolita fashion" gear (w/doll)Credit: wiki commonsattends the rabid fans of these dolls is shocking.  Tween girls are perhaps the most easily influenced group of people on the planet – it is why the world has vapid teen “talent” (such as the Justin Biebers of the world) when many other truly gifted musicians and vocalists can’t get heard.  Evidence of this inanity can be found in the realm of the modern Asian ball-joint doll cult.  Sexually mature adult women are adopting the “Lolita fashion” look (which actually has absolutely no connection to Lolita as played by Sue Lyon, it’s just a name coöpted for particularly excessive youthful couture, and is derived from a Portuguese word); tween/teen girls are, as well.

Seeing a mature young woman engage in cosplay photography is one thing.  She is certainly making, and is capable of making, an informed decision to dress up in baby doll clothes as she sees fit and be photographed or featured in an on-line video or go to cosplay parties dressed as a baby doll.  Younger girls, however, cannot make such mature decisions, and are left to peer pressure and up-to-the-moment trends for inspiration and guidance.

It is in this secondary market of fashion wannabes that the BJD cult can be destructive.  Most teen girls usually try to appear older and more sophisticated in their dress and makeup, wanting to be perceived as more mature Ball-joint doll (silver)Credit: kaboodle.comand womanly.  The Lolita fashion trend, otherwise known as “living doll” fashion, reverses that mindset.  These are women and teen girls who revert to a prepubescent “look” despite the fact that many may have been or are sexually active, or certainly have started menstruating. 

Perhaps one of the most controversial of these “living dolls” is a British girl named Venus Palermo.  With not only her mother’s assistance, coaching, and support, this 15-year-old girl dresses up in baby doll clothing, with a specialized makeup technique that makes her look as if she is about seven years old.  She is a child molester’s dream – the little girl in look who is technically not a little girl at all (although at 15, Venus Palermo is still legally underage for consensual sexual contact). 

This girl has a series of (currently) 81 videos on YouTube, under the nom de guerre, “Venus Angelic”.  She claims the family lived in Japan for a time, and that she started dressing as a doll about two years ago when she was 13.  Her mother encourages the behavior.


Venus Angelic (YouTube)Credit: Venus Palermo, 2012

The “finished” product is frightening – Venus Palermo looks like a pedophile’s plastic dream date when she has finessed her transformation into Venus Angelic. 

She describes in great detail how her makeup is applied, to the number of layers of foundation and powder and other things it takes to “face-up”.  She wears false eyelashes occasionally, but more damaging is the use of contact lenses with opaque, oversized irises tinted on them.  The cornea and iris part of the human eye is avascular – it needs to “breathe” in order to obtain oxygen.  These lenses give the doe-eyed look of the stunned doll, but they can certainly lead to eye problems.  Another disturbing feature about the lenses: they emulate the condition of a woman’s eye when she is sexually aroused or on the brink of having an orgasm.  The dilated pupils and the bright-eyed look of arousal is subtly, if not consciously, perceived by the trolling male, viewer. 

Venus Palermo also adopts the mannerisms of a child-like persona.  She speaks in a baby girl voice, saccharine sweet and cloying, and peppered with obfuscations and sickeningly cutie-pie phrases such as “wonderful summer-sky blue sugary fairy crystal bonbons”.

Proof of the danger to this girl was learned recently when she and her mother hosted a Webcam Q&A.  A predatory male engaged in the conversation quickly enough – the mother put a stop to that, but did not stop the Webinar.  The girl claims she will do this dressing up for the rest of her life.  The psychic damage by enabling her fantasy life is immeasurable right now and will only tell in later years.  One can only imagine what sort of man might ultimately find her attractive – such a relationship could probably only be co-dependent and destructive.

Danica McKellar (the actress who portrayed the adorable girl-next-door, Winnie Cooper, in the 1990’s television series, The Wonder Years) grew up to be a theoretical mathematician (co-creator of a new theorem that bears her name).  As a young adult, she remarked in an interview about the fan mail she received as a child actress.  Most of it, she said, carried elements of nostalgia (“You remind me of my first girlfriend”, or things of that nature).  Occasionally, however, she receivedSoutheast "Asian" BJDCredit: requests for photos of her in bikinis or even nude, or requests to meet a stranger somewhere.  She  refused to objectify herself, although she easily could have. 

Similarly, many women have worked very hard to be taken seriously in the work place and in life.  And while it is certainly arguable about the “seriousness” of any woman’s posing for nude photographs or appearing in a pornographic film, such women are of the age of consent and make decisions without pop culture influence or media frenzy or peer pressure.

Unfortunately, the cult of BJDs tends to ignore the place of young girls in their make-believe world by not only condoning and encouraging the fantasy of females as sexual objects, but taking the further step of reducing them literally to playthings: toys.

Almost certainly, the BJD fan and collectors’ Websites are trolled by many bad men looking to engage any unsuspecting adolescent.  The modern Asian ball-joint dolls are blameless; they are inanimate collectibles that have drawn a group of overindulgent parents and others bonded in an obsessive interest in strange fashions that cannot possibly appeal to a sexually healthy adult. 

It can only be hoped it’s a short-lived fad.


Venus Angelic (random tutorial, re: hair/face-up)

Courtney Love sings about metaphoric doll parts

Trucker Man
Amazon Price: Buy Now
(price as of Jun 1, 2016)